Anointed By Love

Preached at First Presbyterian Church of Rolla on April 3, 2022, the Fifth Sunday in Lent. Based on Philippians 3:4b-14; John 12:1-8.


A month or two ago, I was told a story by a pastor in our presbytery. To make a long story short, the basic point was that each preacher basically has one sermon. Some preachers take a while to find it. Iโ€™ve been preaching regularly for about a year, and you all probably have some idea what my sermon is going to be about, right? Iโ€™m actually going to deviate a bit, so letโ€™s see how it goes.

Jesus probably had more than one sermon, but then again, he was the son of God. Thatโ€™s an unreasonable standard for a preacher. I would argue that the four Gospels represent four variations of his sermon. For example, in Luke, everything centers on the Jubilee. This year C of the lectionary spends most of the time in Luke. Perhaps thatโ€™s an indication to our congregation that when we are searching for a new pastor to lead us, we should remember Jesusโ€™s message of the Jubilee and find someone to help us bring good news to the poor, proclaim release to the captives and recovery of sight to the blind, to let the oppressed go free, and to proclaim the year of the Lordโ€™s favor.

The lectionary has three yearly cycles centered on the three synoptic Gospels, Matthew, Mark, and Luke. In all three years, selections from the Gospel of John are sprinkled in. Today is one of those days. Iโ€™m grateful that Bob went away from the lectionary last week because his sermon on the raising of Lazarus is a great lead-in to todayโ€™s story. We find ourselves at the peak of Jesusโ€™s ministry prior to the start of the passion story.

The Gospel of John has one central, controlling message: Jesus is God. There are seven miracle stories which are labeled as โ€œsigns.โ€ They grow in scope from changing water into wine all the way to last weekโ€™s story of resuscitating Lazarus. Jesus has power over not just the physical world, but even life and death itself. The wedding at Cana indicates that Jesus is bringing about Godโ€™s reign. The raising of Lazarus culminates in the statement, โ€œI am the resurrection and the life.โ€ I AM. The name God tells to Moses, the name by which God has been known throughout the ages, Jesus takes on: I AM.

John builds his argument over the first eleven chapters. Jesus is God, Jesus is God, JESUS IS GOD. Just as the wine in Cana was abundant, equivalent to perhaps 600 bottles, the anointing that Mary did was extravagant. She used a pint or a pound of perfume. Today, we can buy a pint of spikenard for $50 from Amazon, but in Jesusโ€™s day, it would have cost the equivalent of $30,000. Is that too much? Well, is anything too much for God-in-the-flesh? JESUS IS GOD.

After he has been anointed by Mary, he triumphantly enters Jerusalem on a donkey, and then the most profound scene in Johnโ€™s Gospel: Jesus washes his disciplesโ€™ feet. At the very pinnacle of his ministry, when he has raised the dead and been anointed as the victorious Messiah, the Christ, and entered the holy city of Jerusalem, Jesus demonstrates what it means to be God-made-flesh: he serves his disciples as if he were a slave. We cannot comprehend the mystery of the Christ that we serve unless we consider all four scenes together: raising the dead, being anointed, triumphantly entering his city, and washing feet.

In the midst of this critical phase of his ministry, Jesus makes a famous statement, or perhaps itโ€™s infamous. โ€œYou always have the poor with you, but you do not always have me.โ€ This sentence has been used and abused over the centuries to say that Jesus condones poverty, that Jesus blames the poor for remaining poor, so donโ€™t worry about them. The truth is exactly the opposite. This is an allusion to Deuteronomy 15, specifically verse 11. Deuteronomy is Mosesโ€™s instructions to the Israelites as he nears death and they near the Promised Land. The paragraph in question opens with, โ€œIf there is among you anyone in need, โ€ฆ do not be hard-hearted or tight-fisted toward your needy neighbor.โ€ It closes with, โ€œSince there will never cease to be some in need on the earth, I therefore command you, โ€˜Open your hand to the poor and needy neighbor in your land.โ€™โ€ Moses talked at length about the importance of building a society in which there would not be anyone in need, but understood human nature enough to know that any society will fall short of Godโ€™s glory and result in some people being marginalized and left behind. We certainly see that in the world today. America is one of the most prosperous nations in the world, one of the most prosperous nations in human history, and yet 13% of Americans live in poverty. In 2021, more than 300,000 individuals experienced sheltered homelessness, and an unknown number were homeless and unsheltered. We are fortunate to have The Mission here in town, which so far has enabled over 200 individuals to escape homelessness, but not every town has such an effective organization striving to make a difference. Not only that, but in this age of globalization, we should think of the whole world as part of our responsibility. Close to 700 million people globally, more than 9% of the worldโ€™s population, live on less than $2 a day.

This is what Jesus meant. There will always be poor people because of human nature. We tend to take care of ourselves and the people close to us. Thatโ€™s why the Bible talks so much about taking care of widows and orphans. They donโ€™t have any family members who can care for them, so they are reliant on the community for their welfare.

At the peak of his ministry, Jesus reminded his disciples that society will always have people on the margins, so we should live lives of service to them. He demonstrated this servant attitude by washing his disciplesโ€™ feet. But what are we to make of the rest of his statement? โ€œYou will always have the poor with you, but you do not always have meโ€?

In Greek, there are two words for time. Chronos is the kind of time that you track with a watch. Kairos means something more like โ€œtimely.โ€ Kairos time relates to the appropriateness of an action for the specific time. Itโ€™s knowing which action satisfies the highest value on your value stack. We all have a long list of valuesโ€”safety, integrity, generosity, and so forth. We all have a long list of people and things that we valueโ€”ourselves, our families, our communities, and so forth. What is the most important, right now? Is it, for example, safety of ourselves or safety of our families? Well, that depends on the situation. As they say on airplanes, put on your own mask first. You canโ€™t save your child if you pass out, so you have to take care of yourself.

Value stacks: we all have these competing values, and at any given time, one will be highest. Our challenge is to make sure the highest value is the right one. Jesusโ€™s message here was: Yes, caring for the poor is a high value, one that his disciples should have. But in that moment, Jesus was nearing his death. The time was right for him to be anointed, and Mary, in an act of extreme generosity and devotion, made the right choice.

A great quote from Anne Frank says, โ€œDead people receive more flowers than the living ones because regret is stronger than gratitude.โ€ I wonder if perhaps this story was kept by Jesusโ€™s disciples because they regretted their own lack of devotion to their Teacher. In another story featuring Mary and Marthaโ€”perhaps the same sisters, perhaps not, but letโ€™s assume theyโ€™re the sameโ€”Martha was worried about preparing a meal and caring for her guests. Mary was at Jesusโ€™s feet to learn from him. When Martha complained, Jesus said that Mary chose the better path. Mary was devoted to Jesus, to learning from him, to showing her love and gratitude to him. Later on, Peter denies even knowing Jesus. Perhaps the disciples knew, in retrospect, that Mary had done the right thing, and they regretted not showing their love and devotion to Jesus while he was still living.

But we know how the story ends. We do have the opportunity to show our love and devotion to Jesus even today, two thousand years later. Mary had the nard to anoint Jesus after his death, but when Jesus raised Lazarus, she knew that death would not prevail. She knew that Jesus would die, but would not stay buried. He rose and he lives and reigns forever. On one particular day, the most important thing, the highest value, was to anoint Jesus as the Messiah, the Christ, as he prepared to triumph over sin and death. Now, our highest calling is to follow Jesusโ€™s instructions and example in serving his people.

As I mentioned, there are a lot of poor and needy people in America. There are a lot of homeless people in America. There are poor and needy people throughout the world. There are wars around the worldโ€”Ukraine is dominating media coverage, but there are active wars also in Yemen, Myanmar, Ethiopia, Somalia, really most of Africa, and many other countries across Asia and the Americas. Climate change is driving droughts and extreme weather events. The list goes on and on.

In fact, the list is too long. I cannot possibly list all of the problems in the world, much less solve them. I could, on the one hand, just quit and only worry about myself and my family. But as Christians, we are called to do more. Because of our devotion to our risen Lord, we are called to emulate him and serve one another. We will always have the poorโ€”so letโ€™s get to work building a society where there will be fewer in need while taking care of those who our economy has left behind. There will always be wars and rumors of warsโ€”so letโ€™s get to work being peacemakers. Pick one thing, just one thing that is the most important to you, that God has placed on your heart, and get to work showing Godโ€™s love through service to all the people who dwell in this broken world. We canโ€™t solve every problem ourselves, but God can, by working through Godโ€™s people.

Mary anointed Jesusโ€™s feet in an act of love and devotion. She wiped them with her hair. As a result, Mary ended up anointed. In giving all that she had, and all that she was, to her divine Teacher, she was anointed in return to carry on Jesusโ€™s work. In the same way, we come to worship our risen Lord, and in doing so, we are anointed to carry his good news to the world. After all, what is the purpose of worship? Will God cease to be God if we donโ€™t sing praises to Godโ€™s glory? Will Jesus cease to be alive if we donโ€™t pray in his name? No. Jesus is God, and the Holy Spirit is at work in the world whether we participate or not. We come here each Sunday, or tune in on YouTube, so that we can devote ourselves to God and be a part of Christโ€™s body. In glorifying God, we are glorified. Itโ€™s like when Moses went up on the mountain to receive the covenant. When he returned to the Israelites, his face was shining with Godโ€™s glory. When Mary sat at Jesusโ€™s feet to anoint him, she rose up covered with his beautiful aroma. When we encounter God in worship, we are conformed to God and empowered to build Godโ€™s kin-dom, to welcome everyone into Godโ€™s family so they may also experience Godโ€™s love, and joy, and a peace that passes understanding.

In a few minutes, we will partake of Christโ€™s body and blood so that we can receive spiritual food. We will leave here nourished and strengthened, ready to participate in Jesusโ€™s continuing ministry to the world. As we eat these simple elementsโ€”a small amount of grape juice and a marginally edible wafer, for those in the sanctuary, or whatever juice and bread you have at homeโ€”we are reminded of Jesusโ€™s sacrificial love. We are reminded that God came to be one of us. The moment Jesus was born, he was destined to die. But first, he lived as a model of true devotion to all of Godโ€™s people, demonstrating what it means to be a part of Godโ€™s realm while dwelling in this broken world. As we eat these elements, we remember his overflowing love and seek to be vessels of that love. Let us leave here with the beautiful aroma of Jesusโ€™s love surrounding us, anointed to carry his message of hope that will overcome all the ugliness of the world and transform it through his beautiful eternal glory. Amen.

APEC: A Homecoming

Iโ€™m on the steering committee for the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference, having served as general chair in 2017. Itโ€™s held ever year in March (or possibly late February). Itโ€™s a bit unusual in that it has very strong academic participation AND very strong industry participation, including an exposition. At our peak, we had over 5000 attendees and over 300 exhibitors. We were growing every year, like a runaway freight train.

APECโ€™20 was supposed to be in New Orleans starting March 16. Those first few months of 2020 were pretty crazy, with meetings several times a week to figure out what to do. We finally had to pull the plug, in a manner that was unsatisfying to everyone involved. Like the train crash in Back to the Future III.

In 2021, we had hoped to be able to hold it in Phoenix as planned, and even shifted to June in hopes that the COVID status would improve, but again were unable to gather in person. (Iโ€™m not going to lieโ€”I wasnโ€™t looking forward to JUNE in Phoenix!) I was the mastermind behind THE BEST VIRTUAL APEC EVER! And, Lord willing, the only one. We had decent engagement, probably the best of any virtual conference, but it just wasnโ€™t the same.

Last week, we had our first real conference of the pandemic, in Houston. All of our metrics were around the 60% pointโ€”2900 attendees, 220 exhibitors, etc. We had little to no attendance from Asia (especially China). Basically, we have experienced a ten-year setback. Hopefully, the growth over the next few years is quick so that we can return to pre-pandemic size in fewer than ten years, but we shall see.

Still: IT WAS AWESOME! Seeing all my colleagues again. Having a long conversation over (non-alcoholic) beer. Short, casual connections with lots of people. Seeing whatโ€™s going on in industryโ€”new products, companies I had forgotten, mergers and spin-offs. Rejuvenating my creativity in the technical presentations.

Iโ€™m not known as a people-person. Iโ€™m an introvert, and conferences exhaust me. I hate travel, too. But I love going to APEC every year, and I hope to never miss one again. Really, what makes it special is the people. Having spent the first decade of my career in industry (including a start-up) makes me value the perspective that practicing engineers have. The ones who come to APEC are engineers who are dedicated to their craft. Like academics, they strive to understand the limits of technology while pushing them a little bit further in service of their project goals.

Most importantly, they are my community. We all need to feel like we are part of something bigger than ourselves. Iโ€™m a member of several different communities: my university, my church, my town, Steelers fans, elk hunters, etc. APEC gives me an opportunity to transcend geography and connect with people who share a love of power electronics, a goal of improving efficiency and cost-effectiveness of everything from handheld devices to electric vehicles to solar energy to satellites. Going to APEC, wherever it is held, feels like going home.

Canโ€™t wait โ€˜til APECโ€™23 in Orlando!

Gathered Into One Brood – Video

Preached at First Presbyterian Church of Rolla. Based on Luke 13:31-35. Transcript.

Gathered Into One Brood

Preached at First Presbyterian Church of Rolla on the Second Sunday in Lent. Based on Luke 13:31-35.


Today, we encounter one of the passages that reveals and celebrates the female nature of the divine. In the beginning, God created all people, male and female, in the image of God. So that must mean that God has both male and female aspects. In the Old Testament, there are two clear images of Godโ€™s female nature. First, ruach, the Hebrew word used for the Holy Spirit, is feminine. Thatโ€™s why in The Shack, both the book and the movie, the character who represents the Holy Spirit is named Sarayu and is portrayed as a woman, but one that you canโ€™t really look at directly because the Holy Spirit is always on the move. Second, Wisdom is personified in several places and portrayed as a woman. In Greek, Wisdomโ€™s name is Sophia. Who exactly is Sophia? Well, if Jesus is the Word, the Logos as in the opening of the Gospel of John, then I suppose Jesus is Sophia.

In todayโ€™s passage, we see Jesus exhibiting that feminine nature. Although in a male body, he taps into his feminine side and likens himself to a mother hen. Iโ€™m going to try to use both male and female pronouns today. Usually, when I talk about God, I just avoid pronouns altogether. The problem with that is that we have been conditioned for centuries to think of God the Father as male, so if I donโ€™t use a pronoun, most people will mentally insert a โ€œhe.โ€ But God is both male and femaleโ€”we are all made in Godโ€™s image, regardless of our gender. So we need to get comfortable talking about God as โ€œsheโ€ to enable us to see the divine spark in not just men, but also women and people who are nonbinary.

OK, turning now to the text, we see Jesus weeping over Jerusalem. At that time, Jerusalem was the central focus of both the religious and political establishments. In modern America, there is no good equivalent, but perhaps it was something like London in the 17th century, where both the King of England and the Archbishop of Canterbury resided. Or like Moscow today, where the Kremlin is located and where the seat of the Russian Orthodox Church is locatedโ€”also called the Moscow Patriarchate. As an aside, I read a compelling argument from Diana Butler Bass that one of the driving factors of the Russian invasion of Ukraine was a desire to assert Moscowโ€™s primacy as the seat of Eastern Orthodoxy in the region. Putin is looking to re-establish Moscow as both the political and the cultural center of eastern Europe.

The seats of both religious and political power are stereotypically masculine. Historically, most monarchs have been kings, not queens, and most dictators are certainly men. Returning again to Putin, he really leans into stereotypical masculinityโ€”the shirtless horse rides, his dominance in hockey games and as a judo black belt. The Roman Empire had male emperors and governors and client kings. There were female Judges in ancient Israel, but the monarchy rule was all male. Similarly, until the last half-century, the religious establishment has been exclusively male. In fact, if you read the history of the churchโ€”not theology, but about the organizationโ€”itโ€™s sometimes hard to remember that youโ€™re reading about spiritual leaders, rather than power-hungry politicians.

Jesus gives us a different image of God, though. Some of his followers wanted Jesus to replace Roman rule with Messianic rule, trading out a brutal dictator for the true Son of God. But what kind of rule would Jesus have imposed if he had chosen to do so? Not another dictatorship, but the gentle care of a hen for her chicks.

Mosaic on the altar of the Church of Dominus Flevit

We used to raise chickens. Occasionally, one of them would get the urge to nest and would hatch out a brood. Interestingly, the brooding hen would sit on all of the eggs, not just her own. Iโ€™ve been told that hens will sit on any egg, even fake ones, because that maternal drive is so strong. Anyway, once they hatch out, the brood hen will protect them and care for them. Iโ€™ve also been told that in other nesting situations where each hen needs to sit on her own eggs, once they hatch, one hen will take over and raise all of the chicks.

This is a great vision of church unity. We are all Godโ€™s brood. Whether we come to her by being raised in a church or by turning to God later in life, we are recipients of her love and protection. God desires us all to be in her family. Even if we are children of a different religious tradition, God will gather us all in.

Jerusalem was the seat of power, so Jesusโ€™s followers expected him to co-opt that power for his own divine purposes. But that was not Jesusโ€™s way. He proclaimed that the kin-dom of God is at hand, and he proclaimed that in the wilderness near the Jordan, and in Galilee, and in the Gentile Decapolis, and everywhere else he went. In todayโ€™s passage, he said he had to leave Jerusalem because he had work to do elsewhere. His message was not just for the establishment, but for everyone. And what was his message? In Luke, everything centers on Jesusโ€™s proclamation of the Jubilee. It was a time when the worldโ€™s power structures would be turned upside down. As the great Israeli human-rights activist Uri Avnery is fond of saying, โ€œWhen you are on the top, you love stability. When you are on the bottom, you want change!โ€ Jesus had to leave Jerusalem to reach those who were on the bottom, those who were far from the seat of power but desperate for change in their lives.

The passage opens with, โ€œAt that very hour.โ€ So letโ€™s talk a little bit about the context. In the passages preceding todayโ€™s lesson, Jesus was teaching about the kingdom of God using parables. There was also a time when he healed on the sabbath. Then we have this interlude, and then he goes on to do more healing on the sabbath and more teaching about the kingdom of God. Well, Luke doesnโ€™t jump around in the storytelling just for fun or just because he was a bad editor. He situated this story on purpose. So clearly he intended that this story would also tell us something about the kingdom of God or about healing on the sabbath. I think Luke perceived Jesusโ€™s description of the triune God as our divine mother as another parable about Godโ€™s kingdom.

What is the kingdom of God like? Itโ€™s like being gathered as a hen gathers her chicks. God embraces us all, gathering us into her care and protection. Just like a hen with her chicks, God gently nudges us into safety. Chicks will wander around the coop and get themselves into all sorts of trouble. The brood hen canโ€™t prevent that altogether, but certainly tries to protect the chicks from themselves. She helps them find food and water. She helps them grow into adult chickens. In the same way, God guides us to keep us out of trouble. She helps us find the spiritual food and living water that we need. She helps us fulfill our promise as images of God.

As I was working on this sermon, I kept thinking about mothers and how we describe them. A Google search will find you many, many poems about the love and care that a mother shows. Now, I have been blessed with a wonderful mother, but I recognize that not everyone has. Mothers are human, and so they are subject to all of the same limits and weaknesses as every other human being. We all fail to love as we should, some in subtle ways, others in dramatic ways. Jesus was holding up the ideal mother as an image of God, just as God is our perfect father and our perfect sibling. If you take any of the warm-hearted Motherโ€™s Day poems and put โ€œGodโ€ in place of โ€œMomโ€ or โ€œmother,โ€ you will get an understanding of Godโ€™s true nature. Godโ€™s love is like a motherโ€™s loveโ€”made of deep devotion and of sacrifice and pain, endless and unselfish, patient and forgiving. God, like the perfect mother, tells us all the things we need to hear before we know we need to hear them, and teaches us to be unafraid. Godโ€™s love is like moonlight turning harsh things to beauty. Godโ€™s motherly love and protection is the example that we should all aspire to.

The brood hen will also protect her chicks from predators. Sometimes the predator is too strongโ€”like Herod, that fox, who ultimately has a role in Jesusโ€™s death. But the hen does her best to protect her chicks. In the same way, God is our perfect motherโ€”nurturing us while also protecting us from the predators of this world. Perhaps like a mother bear. Bears usually wonโ€™t attack people, but the most dangerous thing you can do is to get between a mother bear and her cub. Bears wonโ€™t go out of their way to pick a fight with a person, but will definitely defend their children. In the same way, Jesus was not a warrior who attacked the establishment, but laid down his life to defend and protect his people.

Throughout this passage, we hear echoes of Holy Week, the time when Jesus would finish his work. He says that he has to leave Jerusalem because thatโ€™s where prophets are killed, but he implies that he will return when the time is right. He says that he wonโ€™t be seen again in Jerusalem until the time when people say, โ€˜Blessed is the one who comes in the name of the Lord.โ€™ Hosanna! the people shout, as their victorious king enters the city on a donkey. He is indeed coming to triumph over the establishment, but not in the way everyone expected. His entry was triumphant, but humble. His victory was not over the Roman government, but instead over sin and death, achieved by taking them on himself. He will protect all of Godโ€™s people as only he can: by sacrificing his own life.

Iโ€™ve also been thinking this week about martyrs. We normally associate martyrdom with the great turning points in Christian history. First at our foundingโ€”the martyrdoms of Stephen and James that we read about in the book of Acts, the Christians sent out to fight lions, and so forth through the first centuries before Christianity became the Roman state religion. Then the Reformationโ€”Luther was almost martyred but was rescued; other reformers werenโ€™t so lucky. Well, if martyrdom is associated with turning points, we must be in another turning-point age. The 20th century had more Christian martyrs than the entire previous nineteen centuries. As in the first few centuries, they were killed because they proclaimed Godโ€™s supremacy over the political powers of the world. They were killed by autocratic regimes around the worldโ€”Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, the Peopleโ€™s Republic of China, and many lesser states who sought to enforce their rule over all aspects of their citizensโ€™ lives. Christians proclaimed that they were part of Godโ€™s eternal kin-dom, and that God held ultimate sway in their lives, not some worldly power or principality. As it is stated so clearly in the Theological Declaration of Barmen, โ€œWe reject the false doctrine, as though there were areas of our life in which we would not belong to Jesus Christ, but to other lordsโ€”areas in which we would not need justification and sanctification through him.โ€ Or as I read in an article about the topic,

Perhaps the most important witness the new martyrs gave in their heroic fidelityโ€”inexplicable apart from their simple love and trust in Godโ€”is the witness to the truth that the politics of power is not all there is. They demonstrated that human beings are not what the totalitarian project said they were: merely machines to be manipulated, for whom faith was an opiate and scientific materialism would be liberation. That human dignity could be preserved by the death of human beings is a paradox of the highest order. It is also, not coincidentally, a paradox at the heart of the Christian religion.

โ€œMartyrโ€ means โ€œwitness.โ€ The martyrs of the 20th century were witnesses to the ultimate truth of Godโ€™s reign, first demonstrated by Jesusโ€™s death at the hands of the Roman Empire. Jesus triumphed not as a warrior, but by laying down his life as a sacrifice. Like a hen protecting her chicks from a fox, Jesus did the only thing he could do to conquer all of the evil of this world for all time: he gave himself to save us all.

The Pharisees were Jesusโ€™s sparring partners, but not really his enemies. Like Jesus, they were seeking the best way to follow God. They knew that Jesus was on a path that put him in conflict with the worldly powers. They wanted him to hide, to run away and save himself, to take the easy path. But he knew a better way. He kept working to show his love, Godโ€™s motherly love for all her children, knowing that Godโ€™s love was the only thing powerful enough to defeat the powers of sin and death. Let us now live into that love, embracing God as our perfect mother as well as our perfect brother and perfect father, and sharing that love with all of Godโ€™s children. Amen.

Temptation in the Desert

Preached at First Presbyterian Church of Rolla on the First Sunday in Lent. Based on Luke 4:1-13.


Here we are on the first Sunday in Lent. I want to start by sharing a little bit about Lent for those who donโ€™t know, or as reminders for the rest of us. Lent is a time of preparation for the glory of Easter. Just as the Israelites wandered in the wilderness for 40 years, and Moses fasted for 40 days before receiving the covenant from God in the Ten Commandments, and Jesus fasted for 40 days as we heard in todayโ€™s reading, the church decided long ago that every Christian should fast for 40 days in preparation for receiving the gift of Jesusโ€™s resurrection.

If you count back 40 days from Easter, the way you get to Ash Wednesday, when Lent begins, is by skipping Sundays. Theologically, Sunday is called the Lordโ€™s Day, and is a โ€œbaby Easter.โ€ Each week, we break our fast and remember that at the end of this time of trial, resurrection and salvation await. I guess also, since we are not Moses or Jesus, 40 consecutive days of fasting would be too much for us, so we get a break each week.

There are lots of ways to observe the Lenten fast. A characteristically Catholic way is to not eat meat on Fridays. Thatโ€™s why Catholic churches have fish fries on Fridays in Lent. Of course, if youโ€™ve ever been to one, you probably didnโ€™t really feel like you were fasting! Sure, they donโ€™t eat meat, but they eat plenty of other stuff.

Some people approach the Lenten fast as a form of self-improvement, basically as if it were a diet. But we should remember that the goal of Lent is not to improve ourselves, but to turn our lives over to God. We fast in solidarity with Jesus. Fasting is a way of removing obstacles between ourselves and God. We donโ€™t just remove something, like meat or chocolate or whatever, but we also add something in its place, some way of connecting with God. Itโ€™s not a time of self-improvement, but of God-improvement.

Right before todayโ€™s lesson, Jesus was baptized. In all three Synoptic Gospels, we read that he was led or driven by the Holy Spirit out into the desert. Later on, Jesus teaches us to pray, โ€œLead us not into temptation.โ€ But here, God does exactly that to him. God the Holy Spirit leads God the Son into the desert so that he can be tested. In the same way, church leaders and all spiritual leaders are tested. Jesus was unique in that he was able to resist all of the devilโ€™s temptations. Maybe he included that line in the Lordโ€™s Prayer because he knew how hard it was to resist.

Some of you may know a little bit about whatโ€™s going on with Salem Avenue Baptist Church. My elk-hunting friend Wayne used to attend there. In December, their pastor, Patrick, had to resign. I donโ€™t want to get into all of the reasons, but I will say that Wayne was in alignment with Patrick and decided to leave that church. Wayne told me that he immediately felt the devil working on him. See, he was a very active part of that congregation, serving in a capacity similar to our session, leading a Bible study, and so forth. He thought, Gee, now I have my Sunday mornings free. Now I donโ€™t need to do all of that preparation for leading the Bible study. No more meetings.

But waitโ€”thatโ€™s not Godโ€™s will. God desires us all to participate in Godโ€™s work in the world, bringing ourselves and others closer to God. Ultimately, Wayne took up the challenge of gathering others who were disaffected and rallying them around their pastor. They have been meeting regularly on Saturday evenings and are on a path towards forming a new church. Wayne resisted the temptation to turn away from God.

The devil has other ways to work on church leaders. Scandal has wracked every denomination throughout history. Regrettably, thereโ€™s an active case in our denomination that Iโ€™ve read about, an allegation of emotional abuse. The root of that case and so many others is the substitution of a personโ€™s will for Godโ€™s will. Church leaders are tempted to believe that they are acting on behalf of God, so they can do whatever they want. I will admit that I have fallen prey to this temptation as well. As you know, Iโ€™ve been preaching here regularly since Lou Ellen left, but really, I have no more spiritual authority than any other elder. Heck, most members of the congregation have been ordained as ruling elders at some point in their lives, so they have just as much right to preach as I do. The only difference is that Iโ€™ve done some training and have committed to sharing Godโ€™s word in this way. I need to remind myself, and to be reminded, that I am called to preach Godโ€™s word, not my word. This is Godโ€™s pulpit and Godโ€™s church, not mine.

Jesus was tempted, and Jesus actually WAS God. He could have been a warrior Messiah if he had chosen to do so. But he didnโ€™t. He chose a different path. He rejected the devilโ€™s temptations by citing Deuteronomy, which was Mosesโ€™s teaching to the Israelites late in life as they were approaching the Promised Land. Letโ€™s look at those three responses. Whenever the New Testament cites the Old Testament, we should read not only the specific verse cited, but also the whole context of that verse.

The first temptation was for Jesus to turn stones to bread. Jesus responded by citing Deuteronomy 8:3, which reads, โ€œGod humbled you by letting you hunger, then by feeding you with manna, with which neither you nor your ancestors were acquainted, in order to make you understand that one does not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of the Lord.โ€ Jesus is teaching us that we should take Godโ€™s message seriously about how to live in this world. Food is important, yes, but so is reconciliation and community. Thatโ€™s something I love about The Rolla Mission. Not only do they care for their patronsโ€™ material needs, including food, but also, they care for their patronsโ€™ emotional and spiritual needs. They foster a sense of community, of connection. They strive to help the patrons move from the margins into full membership in our local society. I was reminded recently about Maslowโ€™s hierarchy of needs. Food and shelter are at the bottom, and are clearly necessary to live, but they are not sufficient for flourishing. As a personโ€™s physiological needs and safety needs are satisfied, they next need love and belonging in order to continue to grow into the person God wants them to be. Jesus reminds us that Godโ€™s word helps us to build a community that satisfies those needs for love and belonging.

Next, the devil promised Jesus power and authority over all the kingdoms of the world in exchange for worshipping him. Jesus responded by quoting Deuteronomy 10:20, which reads, โ€œYou shall fear the Lord your God; him alone you shall worship; to him you shall hold fast, and by his name you shall swear.โ€ That section of Mosesโ€™s speech addresses idolatry and foreign gods. To the extent that you think of the Lenten fast as self-improvement, you should think of ways to reject the idols in your life. What do you value more than your relationship with God? What has become an idol to you that you need to remove so that you can love God with your whole heart? That section of Deuteronomy also teaches that God is mighty and awesome, executes justice for the widow and orphan, and loves the strangersโ€”so we also should love the stranger. We are called not to rule the world in power, but to share Godโ€™s love with the marginalized and neglected.

The final temptation was for Jesus to demonstrate Godโ€™s power by flinging himself from the pinnacle of the temple. Here, the devil revealed himself to be an excellent proof-texter. The Bible is a thick book, and you can find a verse in it to support just about any argument, which is what the devil did. Jesus responded to the devil by citing Deuteronomy 6:16: โ€œDo not put the Lord your God to the test, as you tested him at Massah.โ€ Now, thereโ€™s a back story there about what it means to love God. The Israelites were wandering in the desert and had no water. They were complaining to Moses and rejecting God. They didnโ€™t trust in Godโ€™s providence. At Massah, God provided water from a rock. The message is that if we trust in God and follow Godโ€™s commandments, God will take care of us. We do our part and God does Godโ€™s part.

So in essence, all three temptations were about loving God with all our heart, soul, mind, and strength. Jesus resisted all of the devilโ€™s temptations by remembering how God had cared for Israel. Jesus was full of the Spirit and empowered to preach the good news that the kin-dom of God is at hand. He returned from his testing in the desert to start his ministry. He taught in the synagogues and then went to his hometown to proclaim his mission statement, the central theme of the Gospel of Luke:

โ€œThe Spirit of the Lord is upon me,

ย ย ย  because he has anointed me

ย ย ย ย ย ย ย  to bring good news to the poor.

He has sent me to proclaim release to the captives

ย ย ย  and recovery of sight to the blind,

ย ย ย ย ย ย ย  to let the oppressed go free,

to proclaim the year of the Lordโ€™s favor.โ€

Luke 4:18-19

Jesus trusted in Godโ€™s message of love and reconciliation. He trusted in Godโ€™s providence. He rejected worldly power in favor of equality with all people. Filled with love for his lost sheep, he returned to his community to proclaim the Jubilee. He proclaimed that the kin-dom of God was at hand, and that Godโ€™s realm is a place of freedom, of healing, and of divine rest.

There are two halves of the Great Commandment. Later in Jesusโ€™s ministry, he was asked, โ€œTeacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?โ€ The ultimate answer was to love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, mind, and strength, and to love your neighbor as yourself. The testing in the desert was centered on the first half. In the same way, we all encounter temptations that lead us away from loving God with our whole being. Instead, we start limiting the parts of our lives in which we let God hold supreme authority. We make compromises in our jobs and our investments, supposing that Godโ€™s reign doesnโ€™t extend to the way we make a living. We believe in the myth of redemptive violence, the idea that retribution is more practical than the reconciliation that Jesus preached.

When we limit the dominion of God in our lives, we end up limiting our commitment to the second half of the Great Commandment. We donโ€™t truly believe that God will provide for our every need, so we adopt a scarcity mentality, a zero-sum attitude that emphasizes getting what we can by any means necessary rather than sharing with our neighbors out of our abundance. We read Jesusโ€™s message about welcoming and caring for the stranger, but when we are confronted with an actual needy stranger, we choose our own comfort and safety over the welfare of another of Godโ€™s children.

For we are all Godโ€™s children. Luke gives Jesusโ€™s genealogy in between his baptism and his temptations. Luke traces Jesusโ€™s lineage all the way back to โ€œthe son of Enos, the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God.โ€ We all trace our lineage back to our divine Creator. We are all made in the image of God. So loving God with all our heart, soul, mind, and strength means loving our neighbor as ourselves. In rejecting a person as unworthy of our love, we are rejecting God. As Jesus taught in Matthew 25, whatever we do to โ€œthe least of theseโ€ we do to Jesus himself.

But boy, is that hard. We are constantly tempted to see God in ourselves but not in others and to elevate our own will above Godโ€™s will. Jesus resisted that temptation, but we constantly fall prey to it. As a congregation, a local expression of the one holy catholic church, we are right now wandering in the desert. Like sheep without a shepherd, we will be tempted to stray from the path God has chosen for us. We will be tempted to disengage from spreading the good news of Godโ€™s love for all people. We will be tempted to seek our own material wealth or political power. Above all, we will be tempted to believe that God has abandoned us, that we cannot rely on God to provide for us. We will be tempted to substitute our own will and our own desires for Godโ€™s desires. We will be tempted to treat this church as if it were a social club instead of a God-centered, worshipping community.

During this Lenten season, let us remember that Jesus too was tempted. He could have stepped away from the path laid out before him, the path that he knew would lead to his death. But he didnโ€™t. He knew that he was the Son of God, who would conquer death and reconcile all people to God, creating a new heavenly nation where everyone belongs. We too are children of God, Jesusโ€™s siblings, bound for glorious citizenship in Godโ€™s holy realm. We will be tested, tempted to abandon our calling, tempted to turn away from the path that leads to eternal life. With Godโ€™s help, we can resist that temptation and live as people of God today, loving God by loving our neighbors and believing that God loves each one of us and will never abandon us. Amen.

We Belong in God’s … What?

Recently, a pastoral colleague shared with me the concept of โ€œone sermon,โ€ that each preacher has basically one sermon that they preach. For example, the late Rob Heberer always preached that Jesus is God, often ending up in the upper room with Jesus washing his disciplesโ€™ feet. The message that I generally preach is that everyone belongs in Godโ€™sโ€ฆsomething.

Historically, and in the gospels, we reference the kingdom of God or of heaven. So usually I preach that the kingdom of God is at hand and all are welcome in it. โ€œKingdomโ€ has fallen out of favor, especially in progressive circles, for at least two reasons. One, โ€œkingdomโ€ implies a king, not a queen, and reinforces the patriarchy. God is neither male nor female (or perhaps is both male and female, or perhaps is genderfluid). To identify God as a king limits our ability to perceive Godโ€™s feminine nature. Two, modern Western society has moved beyond concepts of royalty in favor of democracy. Sure, Great Britain is formally the โ€œUnited Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland,โ€ and its constituent countries acknowledge the sovereignty of their queen, but the real power rests in Parliament.

So โ€œkingdomโ€ has too much baggage. What else can we use? Many people use โ€œkin-domโ€ instead. Because of its similarity, when Iโ€™ve used it in my sermons, people in the congregation probably heard it as โ€œkingdom.โ€ But the implication is that we are part of Godโ€™s kin, Godโ€™s family. I used to like it and use it a lot, but the novelty kind of wore off. Itโ€™s a made-up word that seems more of a distraction than anything else.

โ€œFamilyโ€ might work. It would certainly fit the Biblical narrative. Historically, all governments were extensions of the family. Individual nuclear families comprised a clan; clans comprised a tribe; tribes comprised a nation. The king or emperor was considered to be like a father to his subjects. Unfortunately, modern families have decayed. We are less connected to our families now than they were in antiquity, back when children inherited property or learned a trade from their parents. Mobility has meant that our families have scattered to the winds without the same sense of intimacy that we should have with God. Also, while I have been blessed with three wonderful, loving familiesโ€”my family of origin, my family by marriage, and the family of which I am the fatherโ€”not everyone can say the same. Some people have suffered abuse and neglect from the people who should love them the most. Others, particularly people who are LGBTQ+, have been rejected by their families. One answer to that is to say that Godโ€™s family is the ideal to which human families aspire. True enough, but the word can trigger a lot of bad memories.

I donโ€™t have a good answer, but perhaps some synonyms for โ€œkingdomโ€ will work. โ€œRealmโ€ or โ€œreignโ€ arenโ€™t bad. โ€œRealmโ€ connotes a place, so maybe the โ€œrealm of heavenโ€ makes sense. โ€œReignโ€ connotes an action, so perhaps we can celebrate Christโ€™s reign rather than Christโ€™s kingship. โ€œDominionโ€ has some of both connotations: both the place and act of Godโ€™s rule. We just need to be wary of the slippery slope from dominion to domination or domineering behavior. โ€œCommonwealthโ€ is perhaps the democratic counterpoint to a kingdom, but there is no connotation of anyone being in charge. โ€œProtectorateโ€ has potentialโ€”God as our sovereign and our protector.

What about โ€œnationโ€?

20ย But our citizenshipย is in heaven, and it is from there that we are expecting a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ.ย 21ย He will transform the body of our humiliationย that it may be conformed to the body of his glory,ย by the power that also enables him to make all things subject to himself.

Philippians 3:20-21

We hear a lot about white Christian nationalism lately [1],[2]. The problem in many corners of the Christian church is that people equate the United States of America with the kingdom of God. We are not tasked, though, with taking political power and using it to impose our interpretation of Godโ€™s will on our fellow Americans. That was actually one of the three temptations Jesus encountered in the desert. He chose to reject the path of worldly power. We too are tasked with submitting ourselves to Godโ€™s reign in our lives. We are not to think of ourselves as Americans first, but as Christians first. Perhaps if we proclaim the coming nation of God we will remember to set aside our American nationalism and let Christ be our president, our supreme justice, and our commander in chief who wages peace throughout the world.

Jesus came to grant all people citizenship in Godโ€™s nation.

Communities of Belonging

In a recent sermon, I mentioned a concept that I picked up from โ€œFind Your Inner Monk.โ€ We donโ€™t learn philosophy and spirituality and ideology in a vacuum. We donโ€™t simply observe our surroundings and make sense of them on our own. Rather, we form our attitudes and beliefs within our communities of belonging.

Our first community of belonging is our family. As teenagers, each person then starts finding new communities to join. Some find belonging on sports teams, others in clubs, still others in musical ensembles (choir, band) or other artistic endeavors. Or in a church, or in a gang. Each community forms its own belief system; each member both absorbs the communityโ€™s beliefs and contributes to their formation and propagation.

I am an advisor to Common Call Campus Ministry, which recently had an event titled, โ€œWhat Is Progressive Christianity?โ€ It was an information session open to the community. I firmly believe that there are students on campus who find their best path to God through other campus ministries. Yet I also believe that there are students who cannot find belonging in any of those communities, and therefore believe that they are not welcome in Godโ€™s kingdom. Our mission is to help those students learn and grow as they seek the path God has chosen for them.

An unfortunate circumstance has emerged over the past few decades. Where before, communities had a lot of diversity of viewpoints, now they are all becoming more single-minded. We see this in politics: both parties are being taken over by their extremists who are purging (or trying to purge) those who disagree with them. We see this in churches: each denomination or association is adopting theological stances that tend to push out those who disagree. I am proud to be a member of a denomination (PC(USA)) that not only endorses gay marriage, but also allows gay ordination. Unfortunately, some of the largest congregations in our presbytery could not stand to be associated with a denomination that held those beliefs, and left. As a result, our presbytery has become more liberal because we lost those conservative voices.

Last night, I had the pleasure of attending The Gathering, which is a group of people who have been disaffected from existing churches. They are striving to formulate just who they are and what it means to be in community with each other. My prayer for them is that they find a way to disagree agreeably, and keep their priorities aligned. Patrick Wilson opened the evening with some discussion of the Great Commandment:

34ย Hearing that Jesus had silenced the Sadducees,ย the Pharisees got together.ย 35ย One of them, an expert in the law,ย tested him with this question:ย 36ย โ€œTeacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?โ€

37ย Jesus replied:ย โ€œโ€˜Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.โ€™ย 38ย This is the first and greatest commandment.ย 39ย And the second is like it: โ€˜Love your neighbor as yourself.โ€™ย 40ย All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.โ€

Matthew 22:34-40

Jesusโ€™s entire ministry was an exposition of this commandment. Through words and deeds, he showed how we can love God, and how we can love our neighbor. Yet we still struggle with his teachings and seek to limit Godโ€™s dominion over our lives (say, to just Sunday morning) or to limit who we consider to be our neighbor.

Yet if we keep this commandment front and center, we can avoid many of the pitfalls that so many churches fall into. So often, we obsess over petty slights, or argue minor points of doctrine or behavior. Jesus taught that we can disagree about almost everything, except for the fundamental value of each person. If we love each other, we can remain in community together and then grow and change together, each seeking the path that God has laid out for us individually and as the body of Christ.

The Kingdom of God is Enough

Preached at First Presbyterian Church of Rolla. Based on Jeremiah 17:5-10 and Luke 6:17-26.


For a little over two years, I have used a planner called a Monk Manual. The motivating principle behind it is that monks are some of the happiest and most productive people. Steven Lawson, the creator of the Monk Manual, studied the monastic life and developed a way to achieve similar results in secular life. His approach encompasses these ten principles:

  • Gratitude
  • Simplicity
  • Intentionality
  • Order
  • Generosity
  • Relationships
  • Reflection
  • Presence
  • Balance
  • Transcendence

The question is, how can we incorporate these in our daily lives? Lawson developed the Monk Manual as a way of integrating spiritual practices that lead to living out these principles. Just last week, I started a program he calls, โ€œFind Your Inner Monk,โ€ which delves deeper into these concepts.

I want to focus on just a few today to set the stage for the rest of our time together. The first is simplicity. Simplicity begins with letting go. Monks express this tangibly by paring down to the essentialsโ€”both emotionally and physicallyโ€”liberating themselves from the things that weigh down their mind, body, and spirit. The vows of poverty and chastity are the tangible expressions of a dedication to simplicity. Much easier said than done. If you start making a list of all the things in your life that you โ€œneed,โ€ you will find that it includes many things that were unknown a generation ago. Do I โ€œneedโ€ a smartphone? Probably not, but getting rid of it is unimaginable to me.

Next, there are relationships. Monks vow chastity, but do not live without love. Instead, they embrace a different kind of love, the chaste love of brotherhood. In the same way, we can have lives filled with loving relationships. In the Monk Manual, there is a spot for daily gratitude. Most of my entries there are people with whom I have a relationshipโ€”sometimes family members, but often friends who enrich my life, or even casual acquaintances who reveal God to me. Hospice nurses cite that the biggest regret of the dying has nothing to do with achievements or financial investmentsโ€”but has everything to do with relationships. Iโ€™m an engineer and an introvert, so for much of my life, Iโ€™ve focused on developing a few close relationships. Over the past few years, Iโ€™ve tried to broaden my social circle. The pandemic has made that difficultโ€”I think everyoneโ€™s social circles have been collapsing just because it is SO HARD to get together. Still, Iโ€™ve been striving to stay connected with old friends and develop new friendships.

The last principle I want to discuss is presence. Presence means letting go of the past and the future and being fully in the moment. It means really listening to the person youโ€™re talking to, rather than thinking about what youโ€™re going to say next. We are so used to control that itโ€™s hard to let go, and trust that it really is going to be okay, after all. Engaging with whatโ€™s right in front of us, which means giving ourselves fully to the present moment, requires vulnerabilityโ€”which can be terrifying. But if youโ€™re ever with someone who has real presenceโ€”like my friend Ashley Brooksโ€”itโ€™s exhilarating. Their openness and presence are contagious and make you more open and present with them.

Simplicity, relationships, and presenceโ€”three ways we let go of our attachments to the material world and surrender to God. This weekโ€™s Gospel lesson is the opening part of the Sermon on the Plain, which is Lukeโ€™s parallel with Matthewโ€™s Sermon on the Mount. As in Matthew, Luke opens the sermon with blessings, but unlike Matthew, Luke includes the woes here as well. We see these pairings: Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God. But woe to you who are rich, for you have received your consolation. Blessed are you who are hungry now, for you will be filled. Woe to you who are full now, for you will be hungry. Blessed are you who weep now, for you will laugh. Woe to you who are laughing now, for you will mourn and weep. Basically, if youโ€™re down, youโ€™ll be lifted up; if youโ€™re up, youโ€™ll be brought low.

The blessings are for those who trust in God. The woes are for those who trust in worldly things. If you are rich and you think you can rely on your wealth, you will be reluctant to trust in God. But as the saying goes, you canโ€™t take it with you. One day, youโ€™ll have no choice but to surrender all that you have. If you release your attachments now, you can break free of the cycle of blessing and woe inherent to our world and youโ€™ll be more able to live in Godโ€™s realm now. Jesusโ€™s message that the kingdom of God is at hand reminds us that we can live in Godโ€™s kingdom now, not later. But living in Godโ€™s kingdom means not living in a worldly kingdom.

Jeremiah has similar curses and blessings. Cursed are those who trust in mere mortals, but blessed are those who trust in the LORD. Then Jeremiah follows up with a reminder that, โ€œThe heart is devious above all else.โ€ Itโ€™s easy to turn your whole life over to God, or rather to say that youโ€™re turning it over, but hard to really let go. Most often, we say that we will put our trust in God alone, but then donโ€™t follow through. On Sunday, we believe that God will provide, but on Monday, we go to work or check our investments. When I was working with Rocco to design our new house, I started out with the intention of downsizing because our family doesnโ€™t need so many attachmentsโ€”but by the end of the project, we ended up with a bigger house and more storage space for all the stuff we donโ€™t really need. Iโ€™d like to let go and trust in God completely, but itโ€™s a struggle every day.

ย It’s important to remember, though, that these blessings and woes are not commands, but rather are descriptions of reality. If you put your trust in your wealth, youโ€™ll worry about every dip in the stock market. If you are attached to your possessions, they wind up owning you. If instead you let go of your possessions and trust in God, thereโ€™s nothing you can lose. Iโ€™m reminded of Ninoโ€”some of you know him from the Mission. He went through some things, including alcohol addiction and prison, but then found Jesus and turned his life around. He posted once on Facebook, โ€œI donโ€™t have much but I have it all.โ€ He has let go of all his material needs and dedicated himself to serving God, and heโ€™s filled with joy. It’s always great when he stops by the Mission. He lifts people up and makes the community better just by his presence, which reflects the glory of God.

Nino has enough. We live in a society where a scarcity mindset prevails. We worry that we wonโ€™t have enough time to do everything we โ€œneedโ€ to do. We worry that we wonโ€™t have enough money to be secure. So we chase after more money, which uses up the time we donโ€™t have. I was listening to a recording by Father Richard Rohr recently, and he pointed out that our homes and kitchens are full of โ€œtime-saving devices,โ€ and yet we have less time than ever. The pursuit of abundance leaves us always feeling scarcity. We think, If I just have X, Iโ€™ll be happy. I just need a new car, or a new job, or a bigger TV, or a faster computer. Then we get it, and itโ€™s nice at first, but eventually it leaves us unsatisfied. The more we have, the more we want, and the less it satisfies.

So the opposite of scarcity is not abundance. The opposite of the scarcity-abundance trap is enough. Kurt Vonnegut wrote this poem as an obituary:

True story, Word of Honor:
Joseph Heller, an important and funnyย writer
now dead,
and I were at a party given by aย billionaire
on Shelter Island.
I said, โ€œJoe, how does it make you feel
to know that our host only yesterday
may have made moreย money
than your novel โ€˜Catch-22โ€™
has earned in its entireย history?โ€
And Joe said, โ€œIโ€™ve got something he canย neverย have.โ€
And I said, โ€œWhat on earth could that be, Joe?โ€
And Joe said, โ€œTheย knowledgeย that Iโ€™ve got enough.โ€
Not bad! Rest inย peace!โ€

Enough. Instead of striving to have what you want, enough-ness is wanting what you have. The root of this enough-ness is relationships.

Father Rohr reminds his audience that many poor people in Third World countries are much happier than relatively well-off people in America. The reason is that instead of relying on things, they rely on each other. They know that if they are in need, their family or their neighbors will help them out. Instead of putting their time and energy into building up a big bank account, they build up a big social accountโ€”wealth in the form of social connections. Elsewhere I have heard this called the gift economy. I give something to you, not as a loan against some future gift youโ€™ll give me, but as an investment in our friendship. And maybe you wonโ€™t โ€œpay me back,โ€ but in sharing of myself, I help build up a community of belonging where people support each other. Godโ€™s realm is built on something even more powerful: the grace economy. We share not only our time and resources, which are limited, but also Godโ€™s grace, which is limitless. Godโ€™s grace multiplies our efforts and strengthens our relationships.

I mentioned that I started a program called, โ€œFind Your Inner Monk.โ€ Itโ€™s described by Monk Manual founder Steve Lawson as a pilgrimage, but a pilgrimage that takes place in your daily life. In the first lesson, he talks about how we form our ideas, values, and goals, and how we answer lifeโ€™s big questions. Especially in America, we have this image in our minds of the solitary individual deriving answers from first principles and formulating their own vision of how the world works. That image drives the phenomenon of those who say they are spiritual but not religious, instead seeking answers to lifeโ€™s questions on their own. But Lawson points out that thatโ€™s not a reflection of reality. In reality, the influences on our ideologies and beliefs are first our communities of belonging, then the broader culture, and then our personal experiences. That is, our communities of belonging have the strongest influence, and the more we feel belonging, the more permeable we are, the more open we are to the communityโ€™s beliefs.

As we let go of our worldly attachments and invest instead in relationships, we build up those communities of belonging. The more I give to this church, in time, talent, and treasure, the more I feel a part of it, and the more it molds me into its image. We should work towards making our church both a place where people feel complete belonging, and a place where we lift up Jesus Christ and his self-sacrificing love as the ideal that we are all striving to achieve.

Iโ€™ve noticed something curious about the human psyche. You would think that receiving a gift would make you value the giver more and make you feel more a part of the giverโ€™s community. But that hasnโ€™t been my experience. In reality, it is in giving that we ascribe more value to the receiver, and in giving that we feel more a part of the receiving community. It’s as if the receiver validates our gift, and therefore validates us as a person and as a member of the community. Thatโ€™s why so many people volunteer at the Mission and at GRACE and at all of the other charitable organizations in town. Thatโ€™s why a great way to reconcile with someone is not to give them something, but to ask them for a favor, which shows that you value them.

So to build a true community of belonging, we need to value the gifts each person has to offer. If we want to grow in our impact on our community, we donโ€™t need to raise more money for charity, although that wonโ€™t hurt and I would still encourage you to give on this Souper Bowl Sunday. We donโ€™t need to be more entertaining, or to have more programs. What we need is to create spaces where people feel valued, where the gifts they have to offer matter. Some people have financial resources they can share; others have musical or artistic talents, or know how to fix things, or know how to organize and plan, or are good with numbers, or whatever. All of us have life experiences that we can share, things we have learned that can help others see God in a new way. All of us have a yearning to love and be loved.

A community where people truly feel belonging, where they can bring their full selves and all their life experiences and skills and talents, has a name: the kingdom of God. Iโ€™m not sure how to build such a community, but Jesus tells us that the kingdom of God is at hand. Itโ€™s nearby, just waiting for us to enter it. Let us all strive to create spaces where people can give of themselves, their whole selves, and receive in return the grace of God and membership in Godโ€™s glorious kingdom.

Skip to content